Jiangsu Nanyuan HydraulicA Y82 prefix is not enough to identify the material basis of a specification table. Nanyuan’s historical catalog contains both non-metal and stainless-steel Y82 pages. Before copying a value into a comparison, retain the complete source heading, the exact model row and the column label. Otherwise, a carton-specific figure can acquire a stainless-steel meaning that its source never supplied.
Start with the two actual source pages
The historical Y82 non-metal catalog includes a Paper/Plastic Baler table with model entries such as Y82T-25, Y82T-63B and Y82T-100B. One of its columns identifies bale weight on a carton basis.
The separate historical Y82 stainless-steel catalog includes Y82/T-160, Y82/T-200, Y82/T-250 and Y82/T-315. Its table does not supply that carton bale-weight column. These are distinct source contexts, even though both page titles begin with Y82.
This comparison concerns document identity and field meaning. It does not establish that every historical model remains offered, that the two groups are interchangeable or that a numerical rating predicts suitability for a particular feed.
Keep four labels attached to each extracted value
| Label | Why it belongs with the value |
|---|---|
| Source-page title | Distinguishes the non-metal page from the stainless-steel page. |
| Table or subsection heading | Identifies which application group within the page supplied the row. |
| Complete model notation | Preserves the source’s full identifier rather than shortening it to Y82. |
| Column heading and unit | Retains the stated material basis, dimension order or measurement category. |
The subsection matters particularly on the non-metal page because it contains more than one application table. Do not let a spreadsheet’s short column title remove a qualification present in the source. If a heading itself appears inconsistent with the surrounding table, preserve the discrepancy and request clarification instead of correcting it from expectation.
Recognize the unsupported transfer
Suppose a comparison row names a proposed stainless-steel machine but its bale-weight cell was copied from the paper/plastic table. The missing step is not a unit conversion. The figure was taken from a different model and material context. It cannot be relabeled as the stainless-steel machine’s output merely because the family prefix matches.
Replace that unsupported entry with an explicit pending question: what output mass, if any, is supported for the current proposed configuration and identified stainless scrap? Retain the original carton reference in the research record so the reason for the correction remains visible. Do not calculate a replacement from nominal force, chamber dimensions or a presumed density.
Use the current stainless listing for the actual inquiry
Nanyuan’s Y82 vertical stainless-steel baler listing identifies the current inquiry category. Ask which exact configuration and current documents the supplier proposes for your material. The non-metal historical page remains comparison evidence; it is not a new claim that a particular non-metal model is currently available through this listing.
State the stainless grade, scrap form and required output as project inputs. Any supplier response should identify its material assumptions and document revision. Keep an unconfirmed mass field unresolved rather than importing a convenient range from the neighboring catalog.
Separate material identity from other model comparisons
The existing Y82 force and feed-opening comparison examines dimensions within the stainless-steel source. That review comes after the correct source family has been identified. It cannot make a carton-specific mass value applicable to stainless scrap.
Through the contact page, send the exact source URLs, complete model notations and the field that needs reconciliation. Request the current stainless proposal’s own evidence. This preserves the real distinction between two historical tables without inventing output, current stock, machine compatibility or commercial terms.